Navigation versus fluoroscopy in minimalinvasive iliosacral screw placement.

INTRODUCTION: When needed operative treatment of sacral fractures is mostly performed with percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. The advantage of navigation in insertion of pedicle screws already could be shown by former investigations. The aim of this investigation was now to analyze which influence iliosacral screw placement guided by navigation has on duration of surgery, radiation exposure and accuracy of screw placement compared to the technique guided by fluoroscopy. METHODS: 68 Consecutive patients with sacral fractures who have been treated by iliosacral screws were inclouded. Overall, 85 screws have been implanted in these patients. Beside of demographic data the duration of surgery, duration of radiation, dose of radiation and accuracy of screw placement were analyzed. RESULTS: When iliosacral screw placement was guided by navigation instead of fluoroscopy the dose of radiation per inserted screw (155.0 cGy*cm2 vs. 469.4 cGy*cm2 p < 0.0001) as well as the duration of radiation use (84.8 s vs. 147.5 s p < 0.0001) were significantly lower. The use of navigation lead to a significant reduction of duration of surgery (39.0 min vs. 60.1 min p < 0.01). The placement of the screws showed a significantly higher accuracy when performed by navigation (0 misplaced screws vs 6 misplaced screws-p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Based on these results minimal invasive iliosacral screw placement guided by navigation seems to be a safe procedure, which leads to a reduced exposure to radiation for the patient and the surgeon, a reduced duration of surgery as well as a higher accuracy of screw placement.

L4 fixation is not necessary in L5-Iliac spinopelvic fixation after trauma, but coadjutant transilio-transsacral fixation is.

INTRODUCTION: Spinopelvic dissociation (SPD) is a severe injury characterized by a discontinuity between the spine and the bony pelvis consisting of a bilateral longitudinal sacral fracture, most of the times through sacral neuroforamen, and a horizontal fracture, usually through the S1 or S2 body. The introduction of the concept of triangular osteosynthesis has shown to be an advance in the stability of spinopelvic fixation (SPF). However, a controversy exists as to whether the spinal fixation should reach up to L4 and, if so, it should be combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTS). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical behavior in the laboratory of four different osteosynthesis constructs for SPD, including spinopelvic fixation of L5 versus L4 and L5; along with or without TTS in both cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: By means of a formerly described method by the authors, an unstable standardized H-type sacral fracture in twenty synthetic replicas of a male pelvis articulated to the lumbar spine, L1 to sacrum, (Model: 1300, SawbonesTM; Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA), instrumented with four different techniques, were mechanically tested. We made 4 different constructs in 5 specimen samples for each construct. Groups: Group 1. Instrumentation of the L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 2. Instrumentation of the L4-L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 3. Instrumentation of L5-Iliac bones without TTS. Group 4: Instrumentation of L4-L5-Iliac bones without TTS. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, it can be concluded that in SPD, better stability is obtained when proximal fixation is only up to L5, without including L4 (alternative hypothesis), the addition of transiliac-transsacral fixations is essential.

Posterior pelvic ring injuries, lumbosacral junction instabilities and stabilization techniques for spinopelvic dissociation: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: From transiliac Harrington rods to minimally invasive (MIS) percutaneous 3D-navigated transsacral-transiliac screw (TTS) fixation, concepts of fixation methods in pelvic injuries with spinopelvic dissociation (SPD) are steadily redefined. This narrative review examines the literature of recent years regarding surgical treatment options and trends in SPD, outlining risks and benefits of each treatment option and addressing biomechanical aspects of sacral injuries and common classification systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search on the search across relevant online databases was conducted. As a scale for quality assessment, the SANRA-scoring system was taken into account. RESULTS: Sacral Isler type 1 injuries of the LPJ in U- and H-type fractures are frequently treated with stand-alone TTS. Fractures with higher instability (Isler types 2 and 3) require unilateral or bilateral LPF, subject to side involvement, as a buttressing construct, or triangular fixation as additional compression and neutralization, determined by fracture radiation. A more comprehensive classification from which to derive stabilization options is provided by the 2023 301SPD classification. MIS techniques are on the rise and offer shorter OR time, less blood loss, fewer infections, and fewer wound complications. It is advisable to implement MIS techniques as much as possible, as long as decompression is not required and closed fracture reduction succeeds satisfactorily. CONCLUSION: SPD is characteristic of severe injuries, mostly in polytraumatized patients. The complication rates are decreasing due to the increasing adaptation of MIS techniques.

Variables Associated With Loss of Fixation of Retrograde Rami Screws in Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate variables associated with loss of fixation of retrograde rami screws in the treatment of stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Stress-positive minimally displaced (<1 cm) LC1 pelvic ring injuries treated with retrograde rami screws. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Loss of fixation, defined as >5 mm of pelvic fracture displacement based on the radiographic tear-drop distance or >5 mm of implant displacement on follow-up radiographs; revision surgery for loss of fixation. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with 40 retrograde rami screws were analyzed. Median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range 42.5-73.3 years), 71.1% (n = 27/38) were female, and 52.6% (n = 20/38) of injuries were secondary to low-energy mechanisms. Loss of fixation occurred in 17.5% (n = 7/40) of screws with 10% (n = 4/40) requiring revision surgery. On univariate analysis, patients who had a loss of fixation were more likely to have greater dynamic displacement on stress radiographs (22.0 vs. 15.2 mm; median difference 5.6 mm, confidence interval [CI] -19.2 to 10.3; P = 0.04), unicortical rami screws (71.4% vs. 9.1%; proportional difference 62.3%, CI 8.8%-22.6%; P = 0.001), and partially threaded rami screws (71.4% vs. 21.2%; proportional difference 50.2%, CI 10.0%-77.6%; P = 0.01). The remaining variables had no observed association ( P ≥ 0.05) with loss of fixation, including age, sex, body mass index, energy of injury mechanism, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, sacral fracture type, distal rami fractures, rami comminution, number of sacral screws, fully threaded sacral screws, transsacral screws, or rami screw diameter. On multivariate analysis, only unicortical rami screws ( P = 0.01) remained associated with loss of fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde rami screws had a high rate of loss of fixation in minimally displaced LC1 pelvic ring injuries, and this was associated with unicortical screws. These screws should be avoided when possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of Lumbosacral Fixation in Patients with Suicidal Jumper's Fractures: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center in Turkey.

BACKGROUND Suicide attempts that involve jumping from a great height may not be fatal but can result in lumbosacral facture-dislocations. This retrospective study aimed to present the experience from a single center in Turkey of 21 patients with lumbosacral facture-dislocations, or suicidal jumper fractures, treated with lumbosacral fixation between 2015 and 2022. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 21 patients. The diagnosis was established through X-ray and computed tomography (CT) examinations. Neurological damage was assessed using the Gibbons score. Among the patients, 2 were classified as Roy-Camille type 1, 12 as Roy-Camille type 2, and 7 as Roy-Camille type 3. Morphologically, 8 patients had H-type fractures, 7 had T-type fractures, and 6 had U-type fractures. Bilateral spinopelvic fixation was performed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Majeed score. RESULTS The average Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 31.6±12.2. The mean duration of surgery was 123.6±44.9 minutes. According to the Majeed score, excellent results were observed in 8 individuals (40%), good results in 5 individuals (25%), fair results in 5 individuals (25%), and poor results in 2 individuals (10%). Out of 18 patients with neurological deficits, 14 showed improvement after surgery, while 4 continued to experience deficits. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study highlight the importance of obtaining a clear history of the cause of lumbosacral facture-dislocation, as attempted suicide by jumping from a height can cause specific types of injury to the lumbar spine and sacrum that require rapid diagnosis and management to reduce the incidence of permanent paraplegia.

Treatment of an Impending Pathologic Sacral Fracture with a Novel Iliosacral Fusion Construct: A Case Report.

CASE: A 49-year-old woman presented with left leg radiculopathy and posterior pelvic pain. Subsequent evaluation demonstrated metastatic multiple myeloma with an impending left S1 sacral fracture. Immediate posterior pelvic ring stabilization was recommended to prevent fracture and disruption of her oncologic recovery. This was performed percutaneously with computer-assisted navigation using a novel cannulated screw design. CONCLUSION: The patient was treated with prophylactic percutaneous posterior pelvic ring fixation with a novel cannulated screw design that provided a durable construct for immediate weight-bearing. The fixation prevented a pathologic fracture and allowed immediate return to activity.

The Surgical Algorithm for the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System.

STUDY DESIGN: Global cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVE: To establish a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures based on the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) Spine Sacral Injury Classification System. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification has been validated across an international audience of surgeons, a consensus on a surgical algorithm for sacral fractures using the Sacral AO Spine Injury Score (Sacral AOSIS) has yet to be developed. METHODS: A survey was sent to general orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic spine surgeons, and neurosurgeons across the five AO spine regions of the world. Descriptions of controversial sacral injuries based on different fracture subtypes were given, and surgeons were asked whether the patient should undergo operative or nonoperative management. The results of the survey were used to create a surgical algorithm based on each subtype's sacral AOSIS. RESULTS: An international agreement of 70% was decided on by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts to indicate a recommendation of initial operative intervention. Using this, sacral fracture subtypes of AOSIS 5 or greater were considered operative, while those with AOSIS 4 or less were generally nonoperative. For subtypes with an AOSIS of 3 or 4, if the sacral fracture was associated with an anterior pelvic ring injury (M3 case-specific modifier), intervention should be left to the surgeons' discretion. CONCLUSION: The AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System offers a validated hierarchical system to approach sacral injuries. Through multispecialty and global surgeon input, a surgical algorithm was developed to determine appropriate operative indications for sacral trauma. Further validation is required, but this algorithm provides surgeons across the world with the basis for discussion and the development of standards of care and treatment.

Does Fracture Pattern Really Predict Displacement of LC1 Sacral Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Operative management of minimally displaced lateral compression type-1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries remains controversial. We aimed to assess the proportion of LC1 pelvic fractures that displaced following nonoperative management as a function of specific ring fracture patterns, and we quantified the magnitude of this displacement. METHODS: A retrospective review of the billing registry of a level-I trauma center was performed. Two hundred and seventy-three patients with a high-energy LC1 pelvic ring fracture and <5 mm of sacral displacement were included. The fracture pattern was characterized with use of computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs. Absolute and interval pelvic ring displacement were quantified with use of previously described methodology. RESULTS: Thirty-five pelvic ring injuries (13%) were displaced. The rate of displacement was 31% (15 of 49) for LC1 injuries involving a complete sacral fracture and bilateral ramus fractures, 12% (7 of 58) for injuries involving a complete sacral fracture and a unilateral ramus fracture, and 10% (5 of 52) for injuries involving an incomplete sacral fracture and bilateral ramus fractures. In displaced injuries, the average interval displacement was 4.2 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 6.8) and the final displacement was 9.9 mm ± 4.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that fracture characteristics can be used to predict the likelihood of displacement of LC1 fractures that are treated without surgery. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the magnitude of displacement that may occur in association with LC1 pelvic ring injuries that are treated nonoperatively; however, further studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of this displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of sacroiliac screw techniques for unstable sacroiliac joint disruptions: a finite element model analysis.

Vertically unstable pelvic injuries associated with sacroiliac disruption are challenging. Although percutaneous iliosacral fixation using two screws at S1 vertebral body has been shown beneficial, the use of two transiliac screws at S1 has been proposed to increase the fixation strength of the construct. In the herein study, the finite element method (FEM) was performed to analyse the biomechanical behaviour of five different constructions using iliosacral screws only, transiliac screws only, and combining an iliosacral and a transiliac screw. A vertically unstable AO 61C1.2 type pelvic injury was produced for the evaluation of the posterior pelvic displacement and implant stress, and the anterior implant stress using FEM. The symphysis pubis was fixed with a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate in all cases. The model was axially loaded with 800N applied in the centre of S1 body, perpendicular to the ground (Y-axis), simulating the bipodal stance moment. There was a statistically significant reduction in both posterior displacement and implant stresses in the groups fixed with at least one transiliac screw compared to the groups fixed with iliosacral screws. In our FEM study, the construct using two transiliac screws in S1 is biomechanically superior for stabilizing the sacroiliac joint in vertically unstable pelvic ring injuries compared to the other configurations. Lateral displacement, posterior displacement, and von Mises stress were reduced with this construct. A good option can be the use of one iliosacral screw and one transiliac screw in S1.

Pelvis-Sacrum-Lumbar Spine Injury Characteristics From Underbody Blast Loading.

INTRODUCTION: Combat-related injuries from improvised explosive devices occur commonly to the lower extremity and spine. As the underbody blast impact loading traverses from the seat to pelvis to spine, energy transfer occurs through deformations of the combined pelvis-sacrum-lumbar spine complex, and the time factor plays a role in injury to any of these components. Previous studies have largely ignored the role of the time variable in injuries, injury mechanisms, and warfighter tolerance. The objective of this study is to relate the time or temporal factor using a multi-component, pelvis-sacrum-lumbar spinal column complex model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intact pelvis-sacrum-spine specimens from pre-screened unembalmed human cadavers were prepared by fixing at the superior end of the lumbar spine, pelvis and abdominal contents were simulated, and a weight was added to the cranial end of the fixation to account for torso effective mass. Prepared specimens were placed on the platform of a custom vertical accelerator device and aligned in a seated soldier posture. An accelerometer was attached to the seat platen of the device to record the time duration to peak velocity. Radiographs and computed tomography images were used to document and associate injuries with time duration. RESULTS: The mean age, stature, weight, body mass index, and bone density of 12 male specimens were as follows: 65 ± 11 years, 1.8 ± 0.01 m, 83 ± 13 kg, 27 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and 114 ± 21 mg/cc. They were equally divided into short, medium, and long time durations: 4.8 ± 0.5, 16.3 ± 7.3, and 34.5 ± 7.5 ms. Most severe injuries associated with the short time duration were to pelvis, although they were to spine for the long time duration. CONCLUSIONS: With adequate time for the underbody blast loading to traverse the pelvis-sacrum-spine complex, distal structures are spared while proximal/spine structures sustain severe/unstable injuries. The time factor may have implications in seat and/or seat structure design in future military vehicles to advance warfighter safety.

Patient-specific bone material modelling can improve the predicted biomechanical outcomes of sacral fracture fixation techniques: A comparative finite element study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the biomechanical efficacy of six iliosacral screw fixation techniques for treating unilateral AO Type B2 (Denis Type II) sacral fractures using literature-based and QCT-based bone material properties in finite element (FE) models. METHODS: Two FE models of the intact pelvis were constructed: the literature-based model (LBM) with bone material properties taken from the literature, and the patient-specific model (PSM) with QCT-derived bone material properties. Unilateral transforaminal sacral fracture was modelled to assess different fixation techniques: iliosacral screw (ISS) at the first sacral vertebra (S1) (ISS1), ISS at the second sacral vertebra (S2) (ISS2), ISS at S1 and S2 (ISS12), transverse iliosacral screws (TISS) at S1 (TISS1), TISS at S2 (TISS2), and TISS at S1 and S2 (TISS12). A 600 N vertical load with both acetabula fixed was applied. Vertical stiffness (VS), relative interfragmentary displacement (RID), and the von Mises stress values in the screws and fracture interface were analysed. RESULTS: The lowest and highest normalised VS was given by ISS1 and TISS12 techniques for LBM and PSM, with 137 % and 149 %, and 375 % and 472 %, respectively. In comparison with the LBM, the patient-specific bone modelling increased the maximum screw stress values by 19.3, 16.3, 27.8, 2.3, 24.4 and 7.8 % for ISS1, ISS2, ISS12, TISS1, TISS2 and TISS12, respectively. The maximum RID values were between 0.10 mm and 0.47 mm for all fixation techniques in both models. The maximum von Mises stress results on the fracture interface show a substantial difference between the two models, as PSM (mean ± SD of 15.76 ± 8.26 MPa) gave lower stress values for all fixation techniques than LBM (mean ± SD of 28.95 ± 6.91 MPa). CONCLUSION: The differences in stress distribution underline the importance of considering locally defined bone material properties when investigating internal mechanical parameters. Based on the results, all techniques demonstrated clinically sufficient stability, with TISS12 being superior from a biomechanical standpoint. Both LBM and PSM models indicated a consistent trend in ranking the fixation techniques based on stability. However, long-term clinical trials are recommended to confirm the findings of the study.

A Case Report of U-Type Sacral Fracture After Chiropractic Adjustment.

CASE: A U-type sacral fracture, or spinopelvic dissociation, resulting from chiropractic manipulation has not been described in the medical literature. This report presents the case of a 74-year-old male patient who sustained a U-type sacral fracture after drop-table chiropractic manipulation. CONCLUSION: Our case demonstrates that chiropractic manipulative therapy involving the commonly used drop-table can cause severe injury. The patient's course was complicated by a delay in diagnosis and a prolonged hospital stay. Orthopaedic surgeons should have a high degree of suspicion for spinopelvic dissociation in the setting of bilateral sacral fractures. One year after injury, with conservative management, the patient returned to baseline function with mild residual neuropathy.

Operative Technique for Sacral Insufficiency Fractures Causing Spinopelvic Dissociation: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a case of a 54-year-old man with atraumatic, U-type sacral insufficiency and L5 compression fractures leading to spinopelvic dissociation, inability to ambulate, and bowel/bladder compromise. The patient underwent L3-4 percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with bilateral iliac bolts and percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. Postoperatively, the patient had return of bowel/bladder function and independent ambulation at 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: Atraumatic spinopelvic dissociation is an underappreciated pathology in older patients. Here, we describe the result of our preferred treatment strategy, triangular osteosynthesis, to preserve function and independence. Despite optimal, prompt treatment, these injuries pose a difficult rehabilitation process for patients.

Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Iliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon's pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studies examining lag screw compression biomechanics across the SIJ. The objective of this biomechanical investigation was to quantify iliosacral implant compressive loads and to examine the insertion torque and compressive load profile over time. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric pelvic specimens underwent SIJ fixation at S1 and S2 using 11.5 and 10.0 mm iFuse-TORQ Lag implants, respectively, and standard 7.3 mm trauma lag screws. Load decay analysis was performed, and insertion and removal torques were measured. RESULTS: For both implants at S1 and S2 levels, the load relaxed 50% in approximately 67 min. Compressive load decay was approximately 70% on average occurring approximately 15 h post-insertion. Average insertion torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant at S1 was significantly greater than the trauma lag screw. Similarly, at S2, insertion torque of the 10.0 mm TORQ implant was greater than the trauma lag screw. At S1, removal torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant was higher than the trauma lag screw; there was no significant difference in the removal torque at S2. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that a novel posterior pelvic implant with a larger diameter, roughened surface, and dual pitch threads achieved improved insertion and removal torques compared to a standard screw. Load relaxation characteristics were similar between all implants.

Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures.

BACKGROUND: There is no evidence in the current literature about the best treatment option in sacral fracture with or without neurological impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Italian Pelvic Trauma Association (A.I.P.) decided to organize a consensus to define the best treatment for traumatic and insufficiency fractures according to neurological impairment. RESULTS: Consensus has been reached for the following statements: When complete neurological examination cannot be performed, pelvic X-rays, CT scan, hip and pelvis MRI, lumbosacral MRI, and lower extremities evoked potentials are useful. Lower extremities EMG should not be used in an acute setting; a patient with cauda equina syndrome associated with a sacral fracture represents an absolute indication for sacral reduction and the correct timing for reduction is "as early as possible". An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a high-energy trauma, while a worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit represents an indication. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit with imaging showing no evidence of nerve root compression, a laminectomy after reduction is not indicated. In a patient who was not initially investigated from a neurological point of view, if a clinical investigation conducted after 72 h identifies a neurological deficit in the presence of a displaced sacral fracture with nerve compression on MRI, a laminectomy after reduction may be indicated. In the case of an indication to perform a sacral decompression, a first attempt with closed reduction through external manoeuvres is not mandatory. Transcondylar traction does not represent a valid method for performing a closed decompression. Following a sacral decompression, a sacral fixation (e.g. sacroiliac screw, triangular osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic fixation) should be performed. An isolated and complete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an absolute indication. A worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit in a low-energy trauma, sacral decompression followed by surgical fixation is indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus collects expert opinion about this topic and may guide the surgeon in choosing the best treatment for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not applicable (consensus paper).

Sacroiliac versus transiliac-transsacral screw osteosynthesis in osteoporotic pelvic fractures: a biomechanical comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic fractures were often associated with high-energy trauma in young patients, but data show a significant increase in osteoporotic pelvic fractures in old age due to the progressive demographic change. There is an ongoing discussion about the best fixation techniques, which are ranging from lumbopelvic fixation to sacral bars or long transiliac-transsacral (TITS) screws. This study analyzes TITS screw osteosynthesis and sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis (SI), according to biomechanical criteria of fracture stability in osteoporotic human pelvic cadavers ex vivo. METHODS: Ten osteoporotic cadaveric pelvises were randomized into two groups of 5 pelvises each. An FFP-IIc fracture was initially placed unilaterally and subsequently surgically treated with a navigated SI screw or a TITS screw. The fractured side was loaded in a one-leg stance test setup until failure. Interfragmentary movements were assessed by means of optical motion tracking. RESULTS: No significant difference in axial stiffness were found between the SI and the TITS screws (21.2 ± 4.9 N and 18.4 ± 4.1 N, p = 0.662). However, there was a significantly higher stability of the fracture treatment in the cohort with TITS-screws for gap angle, flexion, vertical movement and overall stability. The most significant difference in the cycle interval was between 6.000 and 10.000 for the gap angle (1.62 ± 0.25° versus 4.60 ± 0.65°, p = 0.0001), for flexion (4.15 ± 0.39 mm versus 7.60 ± 0.81 mm, p = 0.0016), interval 11.000-15.000 for vertical shear movement (7.34 ± 0.51 mm versus 13.99 ± 0.97 mm, p < 0.0001) and total displacement (8.28 ± 0.66 mm versus 15.53 ± 1.07 mm, p < 0.0001) for the TITS and the SI screws. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this biomechanical study suggest a clear trend towards greater fracture stability of the TITS screw with significantly reduced interfragmentary movement. The application of a TITS screw for the treatment of the osteoporotic pelvic ring fracture may be prioritized to ensure the best possible patient care.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Screw Loosening after Iliosacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury.

PURPOSES: Screw loosening is a common complication of iliosacral screw fixation, with subsequent loss of stability and fracture re-displacement. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for screw loosening after iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injury. METHODS: A total of 135 patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries who were treated with iliosacral screw fixation in our department between July 2015 and April 2021 were selected for this retrospective analysis. The possible risk factors for screw loosening were investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of patient demographics and trauma-related and iatrogenic variables, including age, sex, body mass index, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) index, mechanism of injury, Young-Burgess classification, site of injury, type of injury, type of screw, mode of fixation, numbers of guidewire adjustments, accuracy of screw position, and quality of fracture reduction. RESULTS: The incidence of screw loosening was 15.6% (n = 21). The mean duration for screw loosening was 3.2 ± 1.5 months after operation. Univariate analysis results showed that the Young-Burgess classification, type of injury, site of injury, type of screw, mode of fixation, and OSTA index might be related to screw loosening (p < 0.05). According to the multivariate logistic regression, vertical shear injuries (Odds ratios [OR] 9.80, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] [1.96-73.28], p = 0.008), type of injury (OR 0.25, 95% CI [0.13-0.79], p = 0.027), common screws (OR 6.94, 95% CI [1.53-31.40], p = 0.012), screws insertion only at the level of the first sacral segment (S1) (OR 8.79, 95% CI [1.18-65.46], p = 0.034), injury site located in the medial sacral foramina (OR 6.28, 95% CI [1.16-34.06], p = 0.033), and lower OSTA index [OR 0.41, 95% CI [0.24-0.71], p = 0.001] were significantly related to screw loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Vertical shear injuries, sacral fractures, injury site located in the medial sacral foramina, and lower OSTA index are significantly associated with the postoperative occurrence of screw loosening. Transiliac-transsacral screw fixation and screws insertion both at the level of the S1 and second sacral segment can prevent screw loosening.

Early Outcomes of Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Stress-Positive Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the early outcomes of patients with stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1b) pelvic ring injuries managed with or without operative fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective comparison study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three patients with LC1b injuries. INTERVENTION: Operative versus nonoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Discharge to subacute rehabilitation (SAR); 2- and 6-week pain visual analog score, opioid use, assistive device use, percentage of normal single assessment numerical evaluation, SAR status; fracture displacement; and complications. RESULTS: The operative group did not differ in age, gender, body mass index, high-energy mechanism, dynamic displacement stress radiographs, complete sacral fractures, Denis sacral fracture classification, Nakatani rami fracture classification, follow-up length, or American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. The operative group was less likely to be using an assistive device at 6 weeks [observed difference (OD) -53.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -74.3% to -20.6%, OD/CI 1.00, P = 0.0005], less likely to remain in an SAR at 2 weeks (OD -27.5%, CI, -50.0% to -2.7%, OD/CI 0.58, P = 0.02), and had less fracture displacement at follow-up radiographs (OD -5.0 mm, CI, -9.2 to -1.0 mm, OD/CI 0.61, P = 0.02). There were no other differences in outcomes between treatment groups. Complications occurred in 29.6% (n = 8/27) of the operative group compared with 25.0% (n = 4/16) of the nonoperative group resulting in 7 and 1 additional procedures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Operative treatment was associated with early benefits over nonoperative management, including shorter time using assistive devices, less SAR use, and less fracture displacement at follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cerclage augmentation of S1-S2 transsacral screw fixation in osteoporotic posterior pelvis ring injuries: A biomechanical feasibility study.

Injuries of the posterior pelvic ring are predominantly associated with osteoporosis. Percutaneously placed screws transfixing the sacroiliac joint have become the gold standard for their treatment. However, screw cut-out, backing-out, and loosening are common complications. One promising option could be cerclage reinforcement of cannulated screw fixations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical feasibility of posterior pelvic ring injuries fixed with S1 and S2 transsacral screws augmented with cerclage. Twenty-four composite osteoporotic pelvises with posterior sacroiliac joint dislocation were stratified into four groups for S1-S2 transsacral fixation using either (1) fully threaded screws, (2) fully threaded screws with cable cerclage, (3) fully threaded screws with wire cerclage, or (4) partially threaded screws with wire cerclage. All specimens were biomechanically tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading until failure. Intersegmental movements were monitored by motion tracking. The transsacral partially threaded screw fixation with wire cerclage augmentation resulted in significantly less combined angular intersegmental movement in the transverse and coronal plane versus its fully threaded counterpart (p = 0.032), as well as in significantly less flexion versus all other fixations (p ≤ 0.029). Additional cerclage augmentation could be performed intraoperatively to improve the stability of posterior pelvic ring injuries treated with S1-S2 transsacral screw fixation. Further investigations should follow to consolidate the current results on real bones and possibly consider execution of a clinical study.

An Interim Analysis of the First 102 Patients Treated in the Prospective Vertebral Augmentation Sacroplasty Fracture Registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of sacroplasty for treating sacral insufficiency fractures, including the effect on pain relief, patient function and adverse event rates in an as-treated on-label prospective data registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational data including patient reported outcomes (PROs), patient characteristics, osteoporosis treatment, fracture duration, cause of sacral fractures and image guidance used for treatment were collected for patients undergoing sacroplasty. The PROs were collected at baseline then at one, three, and at six months following the procedure. The primary outcomes were pain as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and function as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Secondary outcomes included adverse events, cement leakage, new neurologic events, readmissions and death. RESULTS: The interim results for the first 102 patients included significant pain reduction with mean pain improvement scores at six months decreasing from 7.8 to 0.9 (P < .001) and significant improvement in function with mean RMDQ scores improving from 17.7 to 5.2 (P < .001). Most procedures were performed under fluoroscopy (58%). There was cement leakage in 17.7% of the subjects but only one adverse event which was a new neurologic deficit related to cement extravasation. The readmission rate was 16% mostly due to additional back pain and fractures and there were no subject deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Sacroplasty with cement augmentation for acute, subacute and chronic painful sacral insufficiency fractures caused by osteoporosis or neoplastic disorders results in highly significant improvements in pain and function with very low rate of procedural related adverse events.